Raxx · internal docs

internal · gated ↑ index

Competitor — Interactive Brokers (IBKR)

Status: v2 (marketing-strategist, 2026-04-21). Pricing unverified — WebFetch/WebSearch denied in this session. All numbers from training cutoff January 2026. Attempted live URL: https://www.interactivebrokers.com/en/pricing/commissions-home.php. Timestamp of attempted fetch: 2026-04-21T00:00Z (blocked).

What they are

Interactive Brokers (IBKR) is the institutional-grade retail brokerage — the platform serious retail and small-professional traders graduate to for global market access, lowest margin rates in the industry, and deep instrument coverage (stocks, options, futures, forex, bonds, funds, crypto in some jurisdictions, 150+ markets in 33 countries).

Public, founded 1977 by Thomas Peterffy. Quant/market-maker DNA still visible.

Positioning (what they say about themselves)

Pricing (as of training cutoff 2026-01 — unverified)

Source attempted: https://www.interactivebrokers.com/en/pricing/commissions-home.php (blocked 2026-04-21)

IBKR Lite - US stocks & ETFs: $0 commission - Options: $0.65/contract (flat) - No subscription - PFOF enabled

IBKR Pro - Fixed: $0.65/contract options, $0.005/share stocks (min $1/order, max 1% trade value) - Tiered: $0.15–$0.65/contract options sliding with monthly volume (<10k = $0.65; 10k-50k = $0.50; 50k-100k = $0.25; >100k = $0.15) - No PFOF - Market-data: $4.50-$15/mo per bundle (US Equity, US Options, OPRA)

No SaaS subscription tier. Revenue is commissions + margin interest + market-data.

How Raxx differentiates (the one-paragraph answer)

IBKR is the best execution venue in retail and has no opinion about what trade to place; Raxx is the opinion layer and has no opinion about where to execute. Those are complementary, not competitive. IBKR assumes you arrive knowing the trade — they fill it cleanly, cheaply, across 33 countries. Raxx assumes you arrive with a P/L goal ("$1k/week premium, $3k max loss on SPX") and hands you three structures qualified on paper. The pitch to an IBKR power user: "Keep IBKR for execution. Use Raxx to decide what to execute." We also solve the UX problem IBKR has never solved — TWS is a 1990s-roots Java app with a legendary learning curve; Raxx is passkey-only, modern, one-persona-optimized, and deliberately the anti-TWS.

What they do well

Where Raxx has room

  1. UX is famously hostile. TWS is 1990s-roots Java. Cottage industry of "IBKR for beginners" courses.
  2. No AI / no proposal engine. IBKR assumes you know the trade.
  3. No opinionated options workflow. TWS supports every structure via 400 knobs; no "propose 2-3 structures to my weekly target" flow.
  4. No paper-trade retention as first-class feature. Paper account exists; not strategy-level audit-traced.
  5. Market-data is a la carte. Running IBKR at home means assembling $4.50-$15/mo subscriptions. Raxx folds reasonable options-data into Pro.

Where they have room (honest)

Implications for positioning

Watch-list signals

Verification queue for human