Raxx · internal docs

internal · gated ↑ index

Competitor — tastytrade

Status: v2 (marketing-strategist, 2026-04-21). Pricing unverified — WebFetch/WebSearch denied in this session. All numbers from training cutoff January 2026. Attempted live URL: https://tastytrade.com/pricing/. Timestamp of attempted fetch: 2026-04-21T00:00Z (blocked).

What they are

tastytrade (formerly tastyworks) is a retail brokerage built explicitly around options traders. Spun out of the tastylive media property, it pairs a commission-based brokerage with a large library of education content hosted by Tom Sosnoff and crew. The demographic is opinionated: self-directed options traders, many of whom came up through thinkorswim pre-Schwab acquisition.

Owned by IG Group since 2021.

Positioning (what they say about themselves)

Pricing (as of training cutoff 2026-01 — unverified)

Source attempted: https://tastytrade.com/pricing/ (blocked 2026-04-21)

Product Commission
Stock & ETF $0
Equity options — open $1.10 per contract, capped at $10 per leg
Equity options — close $0
Index options (SPX, NDX, etc.) $1.10 open, $1.10 close, separate cap (verify)
Futures $1.25 per contract per side
Futures options $2.50 per contract per side
Subscription None
Paper trading Free

The $10/leg open cap remains the headline. A 10-wide iron condor (4 legs) costs at most $40 open / $0 close regardless of size. Structurally cheaper than IBKR Pro for multi-contract retail volume.

How Raxx differentiates (the one-paragraph answer)

tastytrade is a broker; Raxx is the research layer a broker cannot credibly build. A tastytrade recommendation is implicitly "do this on tastytrade" — their revenue (commissions + PFOF) depends on it. Raxx has no brokerage revenue and no PFOF, so our proposal engine is free to recommend the structure that hits the user's P/L target regardless of which venue executes it cheapest. We also treat paper trading as a multi-year audit-traced qualifying round, not a tutorial mode — that's a product category tastytrade hasn't entered because brokerages get paid on live fills, not paper retention. The positioning: "Keep your tastytrade account and its commission cap. Run Raxx on top."

What they do well

Where Raxx has room

  1. They are a broker, not a research layer. Business-model conflict prevents cross-broker recommendations.
  2. No AI proposal engine. UI is great at building a spread once you know what you want; it does not answer "what structure hits $1k/week with <$3k risk on SPX right now?"
  3. Paper trading is not audit-traced, tiered retention. Our paper-first-pipeline framing is net-new.
  4. Content is the funnel, not the product. A tastylive viewer still spends their afternoon in a spreadsheet. We are the spreadsheet's replacement.
  5. Closed ecosystem. You cannot bring a tastytrade paper book anywhere else; you cannot run tastytrade probabilities against an IBKR live account.

Where they have room (honest)

Implications for positioning

Watch-list signals

Verification queue for human